The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Evolutionary Theory, the Nature of Science & High School Biology Teachers: Critical Relationships
Abstract
WITHOUT question the most powerful theory within the field of biology is that of evolution. Evolutionary theory allows for the investigation of a broad spectrum of interesting biological questions in a scientifically meaningful way. It provides a mechanism for exploration of the intriguing ‘‘hows’’ and ‘‘whys’’ we are compelled to ask concerning the tremendous diversity of life. With it, the multitude of traits and behaviors of organisms take on meaning. Indeed, as Dobzhansky (1973) elegantly stated, ‘‘Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution’’ (p. 125). Yet, despite the fact that evolutionary theory is extremely well-supported and non-controversial within the scientific community, it has not been as well received by the general public. Several studies reveal that a sizable portion of Americans have little understanding of evolutionary theory and reject it as a valid explanation of the current state of life (Ching 1984; Edwords 1981a; Edwords 1981b; Holden, 1988; National Science Board 1989). This difference in understanding and acceptance of evolutionary theory between the scientific community and the general public represents more than a lag between the generation of knowledge in a discipline and its dissemination to the public through the educational system. Rather, it represents a gulf in understanding that has not been successfully bridged through a century of science education. The factors contributing to this gulf are complex and manifold. The teachi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hence, evolutionary theory is the cornerstone of the discipline of biology (Rutledge and Warden, 2000).”
From Science and evolution. (2019) · cites this paper as Rutledge and Warden, 2000
In the citing paper
“It has endured daily and rigorous testing, and it stands as the unifying theory in biology (Rutledge and Warden, 2000).”
From Science and evolution. (2019) · cites this paper as Rutledge and Warden, 2000
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 298
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Carlesen, 1991, Science Education, 75, 631, 10.1002/sce.3730750605 · DOI
- Ching, 1984, Origins, 11, 99
- Dobzhansky, 1973, The American Biology Teacher, 35, 127, 10.2307/4444260 · DOI · Paper page
- Edwords, 1981, Creation/Evolution, 2, 37
- Edwords, 1981, Creation/Evolution, 2, 48
- Grossman, 1989, Teachers College Record, 91, 191, 10.1177/016146818909100201 · DOI
- Hashweh, 1987, Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109, 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90012-6 · DOI
- Holden, 1988, Science, 240, 277, 10.1126/science.3353723 · DOI
- Tatina, 1989, The American Biology Teacher, 51, 275, 10.2307/4448925 · DOI
- Van Koevering, 1989, The American Biology Teacher, 51, 200, 10.2307/4448903 · DOI
- Zimmerman, 1987, Ohio Journal of Science, 87, 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Middle Tennessee State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rutledge, Michael L.
- Warden, Melissa A.
- ORCID
- Rutledge, Michael L.
- Venue
- The American Biology Teacher
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 0002-7685 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4211
- OpenAlex
- W2176879441
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 23.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Biology Teacher (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- evolutionary theory, high school biology teachers, nature of science, public acceptance of evolution, evolution education, religious opposition to evolution, teacher beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary Theory, the Nature of Science & High School Biology Teachers: Critical Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062%5B0023:ettnos%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary Theory, the Nature of Science & High School Biology Teachers: Critical Relationships. The American Biology Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062%5B0023%3Aettnos%5D2.0.co%3B2